101 Ways UK Small Businesses Can Save Energy And Lower Their Costs

Carbon TrustThere are undoubtedly 101 ways UK small businesses can save energy and lower their costs. But just how significant would it be if SMEs increased their energy efficiency?

According to the Carbon Trust, UK SMEs account for 45 per cent of business energyusage and, says Harry Morrison, general manager of the Carbon Trust Standard Company, UK SMEs have the greatest potential for on energy: 20 per cent compared to eight per cent for larger organisations.

“That means that when added together, the potential for savings by SMEs could be up to £1.1 billion,” says Morrison.

The truth about UK small business energy consumption

The bad news, however, is that the big majority of UK small businesses are missing out on savings because they are not aware of energy efficiency solutions that can save them money and lower their environmental impact. Perhaps because engineering companies devising energy saving solutions for the workplace are not good at communicating with small business.

Read more: http://www.greenwisebusiness.co.uk/news/101-ways-uk-small-businesses-can-save-energy-and-lower-their-costs-2841.aspx

Time To Get Your Skates On

When the Government introduced “Feed in Tariffs” (or FIT’s) to encourage people and businesses to install micro-generation of renewable energy equipment they were fixed for a period of 2 years. The idea behind FIT’s is a sound one: new technologies take time to move through an adoption curve but not all of them make it (who remembers Betamax?). Governments can affect the likelihood of success of desirable technologies by encouraging people to adopt them earlier than “the market” might otherwise deliver. In the case of FIT’s a surcharge on existing electricity users (where most is generated from fossil fuel) is used to give a premium to people who invest their own capital in micro-generating equipment. This premium serves to make the return on investment seem better and so kick-starts the market. Once the new market in renewable technologies gathers pace and size, economies of scale start to become apparent, driving down prices and the government can reduce the size of the incentive.

The difficult task for the government is trying to work out a balance between how big the incentive should be and how long it should run for to attract the “right” amount of investment. Too big an incentive and the market develops too quickly for the infrastructure to serve it properly, run the incentive too long and the opposition accused you of “market distortion” (don’t forget though that the way we account for economic activity is the biggest market distortion of all, which is why ordinary activity is destroying the future).

The trouble with the concept of “right” amounts of investment is that it is a political moving feast and, it appears, one that the government can’t really decide what it wants. The first problem came just a few months into the implementation of the new regime when it became apparent that large investors saw the potential returns on investment as being attractive. A rash of large scale projects were mooted, potentially covering the farmlands of Devon and Cornwall with PV panels.  Ooops! That wasn’t what we intended said the government and promptly cut the size of payment available to large scale schemes. Now, with the review date of April 2012 in sight they have published a “consultation” for future levels of support and, it appears that they think the FIT’s have been too successful as they have prompted 100,000 installations. So, the proposal is to cut the rate for domestic systems by just over half! And, in a nasty move that only a politician would be able to justify, systems that have not been installed by 12th December 2011 will only get the current support level until the 31st March 2012 and then they, too will fall to the new rate. Quite how that squares with the original support rates being guaranteed for 2 years is beyond me.

Any government action that undermines confidence is, in my view, a bad one. Putting in solar panels is not cheap; about on a par with buying a new family car. However, whereas with the car you know what you are getting, with the solar panels there is more uncertainty. Will they really generate the amount of electricity they say they will? Will people object to how my house looks with them on? Will they really last 25 years? What will happen if a move house? These are all the kind of issues that the payment is helping to overcome. Maybe the 100,000 installs are enough and the market now has enough momentum but as that represents less than 0.5% of the available roofs, I am pretty dubious.

If you had been thinking about installing a solar system then you really need to get your skates on if you want to benefit at the original rate. Although the actual installation only needs a few days, the process of finding and selecting an installer plus, possibly, completing site preparation work means that it will be a pinch to get a system installed and registered before December 12th. Have a look at the Solar Trade Association or Good Energy for help in find suppliers. You can also express your views on the changes to the FIT’s by visiting the Department of Energy & Climate Change website.

Source:
Harold Forbes
How to be a Humankind Superhero” is about taking action to reclaim a safe climate.
You can also join the Facebook page for further updates or follow Harold on Twitter @haroldforbes

Bolton kids unveil plans to transform torched pub

Children in Bolton have made calls for an arson-struck pub to be specially-transformed into a new recycling centre.

The empty pub in question, The Prince Rupert, in Morris Green, a suburb of the Lancashire town, was targeted on the 1st of May. Around the local area, it is widely believed that someone first broke into the building before setting it alight.

Year five pupils of the nearby Lever Edge Primary Academy have made calls for urgent improvements to be made to the site and have already submitted a petition with 300 signatures and presented it to Bolton City Council.

Read more: http://www.recycle.co.uk/news/2811000.html

 

An Opportunity to Shape Your Local Area

Local politics is often overlooked by campaigning groups but many of the decisions which have direct impact on your local environment are taken by local councils. Since the coalition government came to power, the relationship between local and central government has been changing: decentralising government is one of the current major themes – transferring power from central government to local authorities and the communities and individuals they represent. Whatever your political view, the truth is that now is possible a unique time to be able to shape your local area.

The Department of Communities and Local Government is presently undertaking a review of statutory duties that central government currently places on local authorities. They have identified 1,294 “duties” and admit that they are aware that this is not a complete list. (For those who are interested, “duties” are different from “powers” in that a duty which is something the Council must do and a power is something they may do i.e. discretionary).

You have the opportunity to comment on the duties and to challenge government on those which you feel are burdensome or no longer needed but you need to act quickly as the consultation is only open to April 25th. To make your views known, visit the local government website.

Source: Harold Forbes - http://www.hksuperh.com/Newsletter

Russia to become dumping ground for US nuclear waste

Russia will become the world’s largest nuclear dump after a lucrative agreement is signed with the US.

The deal, which was withdrawn by George W Bush during his presidency, was resubmitted by President Barack Obama and gives the green light for nuclear waste from all US power stations to be stored in Russia. US power stations account for 80 per cent of the world’s radioactive waste.

Amidst Siberia’s beautiful forested landscape is the world’s biggest closed nuclear city, Zheleznogorsk. With the water sources near the site already contaminated, construction is underway to extend the plant to store the majority of the planet’s nuclear waste.

However, not far from the closed nuclear site is a village of rural families that have been tending the land for generations. More than two thousands miles away, activists are campaigning for the government to halt the proposed scheme. According to environmental opponents, the move will turn Russia into a giant radioactive garbage bin.

Greenpeace’s Vladimir Chubrov said that billions of dollars are going to bureaucrats, but local people are suffering from the deal. He added that the Russian people would be at increased risks of nuclear accidents.

According to local ecologist Nikolai Zubov, the large river close to the site is one of Russia’s largest. Mr Zubov said it does not make sense for Russia to take waste after another country has already gotten the energy.

Economic downturn leads to less food waste

The latest numbers from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) show that in the age of austerity Britons are throwing away less food.

Figures from the most recent data collected by the state department show that food waste fell last year by 2.7 per cent dropping to 23.6 million tonnes. According to experts the downwards trend comes from people becoming increasingly conscientious of waste and making things last.

As trends move towards sustainable living and growing your own food, more people have set-up compost heaps in their backyards and begun buying fewer groceries at the store. Even celebrity chefs have hopped on board the craze, creating easy recipes using food scraps.

Read full article: http://www.recycle.co.uk/news/2715000.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+recyclenews+(Recycling,+Green,+and+Environmental+News)

New EU directive calls for better nuclear waste storage

A new EU directive proposal was presented on Wednesday calling for national plans to be drafted over the next few years, as the international body still has no permanent storage sites for radioactive waste.

As plans are made, exports of nuclear waste outside of the EU for long-term storage will be banned. The commission said that current sites are usable for 100 years at most, however, high-level waste created by nuclear power facilities can take nearly a million years to decompose.

Finland revealed plans to have long-term hazardous waste storage facilities operational by 2020. Sweden will follow in its neighbor’s footsteps by 2023 and France announced a target of 2025 for a long-term waste repository.

Each year, the EU creates around 7,000 cu m of high-level nuclear waste. A majority of the radioactive rubbish is comprised of spent nuclear fuel that is no longer usable. EU Energy Commissioner, Guenther Oettinger said that safety was of the utmost importance and that if a nuclear accident were to happen in one country, it could also have devastating effects for other member states.

The Commission said that among scientists there is a broad consensus that highly-toxic waste is best disposed of underground. Nearly 200 scientists advised that spent nuclear waste be buried deep in the ground in a report published last year.

Currently, 14 of the EU’s 27 states contain nuclear power plants. France, at 58 nuclear facilities, has the largest, by far. In total, there are 143 nuclear power sites still in use within the EU, yet scientists say that infrastructure for storing the slow-decaying waste is lacking.

Sainsbury’s installs geothermal exchange system in superstore

Sainsbury’s announced the opening of its store in Crayford, which will mark the first use of geothermal exchange technology in a supermarket in the UK.

The superstore, which covers 9,000 square meters, has been built to use Greenfield Energy’s latest innovative technology that uses ground heat to heat and cool the store. The extension to the Greater London-based Crayford store is just one in a series of new store openings for the UK supermarket chain.

According to the firm, the extended store is the world’s first supermarket to use the technology. The ‘geo exchange’ system allows boreholes underneath the structure to draw up energy from the earth and use it to generate natural heat and cooling.

Mike Coupe, group commercial director for Sainsbury’s said that it was an exciting move for the grocer and that the team at Crayford had worked hard to create an innovative new store with several firsts in features for Sainsbury’s. CEO of Greenfield Energy, Grahame Newton said that the system was cutting-edge and that the firm was proud, as a smaller renewable energy venture, to have such a brand name as Sainsbury’s to be implementing the equipment.

The supermarket chain has calculated that the move will save 30 per cent in carbon emissions compared to its traditional supermarket buildings. Sainsbury’s added that despite the store being two and half times bigger, it gives off the same carbon output because of the revolutionary new system.

Severn Estuary tidal project scrapped

The Government has scrapped the controversial wave power scheme planned at the Severn Estuary.

The proposed 10-mile damn that would run the length of Somerset to South Wales would have generated five per cent of the country’s energy, said supporters. However, Chris Huhne, energy secretary, said that a study of the proposal has revealed that the project would not be a strategic move.

Instead, plans have been announced to build eight new nuclear power stations by 2025. Plants have been proposed for Somerset, Gloucestershire, Suffolk, Lancashire and Anglesey.

The Severn barrage was set to use a hydro-electric dame to capture tidal energy from the ebb and flow of the tide as opposed to the river. The estuary houses the second-largest tidal range on the planet.

The project, however, has been deemed a high risk within a feasibility report and concluded that it will be too difficult to attract private investors. Mr Huhne said that the proposal will be kept as an option in the future, but that market conditions first must improve.

The study also shows that at the moment public funding is not healthy enough to support such a scheme. He added that there were other low carbon options that would prove a bett